|
Crew escape systems are an integral feature in combat aircraft. Two main
concerns with such systems are their aerodynamic stability, and
the potential injury level to which their occupants are exposed.
CFDRC, sponsored by the US Navy and the SBIR program, has been on
the forefront of developing CFD technology for escape system aerodynamic
analysis, design support and injury reduction. CFDRC engineers have
worked very closely with the U.S Navy and major ejection seat manufacturers
on developing and applying CFD technology to support major escape
system programs including ejection seat upgrades, mishap investigations
and design of new systems. Areas of applications include ejection
seat and canopy trajectory simulation, windblast protection, stabilization
devices, head and neck injury assessment, helmet mounted Display
(HMD) and goggles, inflatable restraint systems and rocket plume
interference. The developed numerical technologies and related capabilities
have been incorporated into the CFD-FASTRAN
code.
Our engineers have performed analysis and design support on all
major NATO ejection seats in service including the NACES, ACES-II,
SIIIS, Martin Baker MK16 seat and their variants.
|
 |
Crew Abort Simulation Technologies for Space Explorations Vehicles
|
NASA's vision for Space Exploration will enable humans to pioneer
the solar system but before humans can move through the cosmos they
must leave Earth safely and return in-tact. The loss of the Space
Shuttle Columbia has strengthened NASA's focus on crew protection,
abort and overall health and protection. A significant driver in
spacecraft design must include an understanding of physiological
effects of acceleration loads, stability and control induced loads,
and blast induced loads translated through a spacecraft to the crew
compartment.
CFDRC has been involved in collaboration with NASA and private
industry on the adaptation and application of well-proven aircraft
crew escape system simulation technologies for launch vehicle applications.
The application of this simulation technology will reduce the complexity
and weight that would otherwise be added to compensate for uncertainties
in crew abort scenarios. The proper response of the crew abort or
escape system (CES) to a launcher failure is critical to the success
of any crew exploration vehicle architecture. This simulation technology
will make significant contributions in this little-understood area.
The simulations on the left are examples of demonstration simulations
that were conducted by CFDRC engineers for NASA and industry partners.
|
Apollo 11 Separation Simulation
from Saturn-V Launch Vehicle
Click image for movie
Ejection Seat Separation Simulation
from a Space Shuttle Like Configuration
Click image for movie
|
Aerodynamic Stabilization Devices
|
The US Air Force and U.S. Navy, as well as commercial ejection
seat manufacturers, are constantly investigating new concepts and
devices to stabilize ejection seats and their occupants in high-speed
flows. CFDRC engineers have performed computational analyses on
a variety of aerodynamic stabilization devices including deployable
fins and extendable booms.
CFD plays an integral role in early trade studies and in down selection
of potential designs. The data generated from CFD computations includes
aerodynamic forces and moments for evaluating the stability and controllability
of the seat with and without the stabilization device, and surface pressures
for assessing the windblast loads and potential occupant injuries. Additionally,
the near-field flow-field solution data can be used to determine the effects
that stabilization devices would have on the sensors that are installed
in the seat, such as the Pitot tubes.
CFDRC engineers have provided analysis and design support to several
programs including the Navy NACES Pre-Planned Product Improvement (P3I)
program, The Joint Escape System Program (JESP) and the Navy Stability
Improvement Program (SIP).
|
Martin
Baker MK-16 Ejection Seat
and 98 Percentile Occupant |
Windblast Protection
|
During egress from an aircraft, the occupant of an ejection seat is exposed
to severe windblast effects from the oncoming flow. The US Department
of Defense, as well as manufacturers of ejection seats, have been continuously
working on developing better ways of shielding the occupants from these
effects.
CFDRC engineers have provided analysis and design support during the
development and optimization of new windblast protection concepts. CFDRC
engineers have investigated ways of stagnating the flow over the helmet
region through the use of brim designs. Methods of protecting the occupant's
torso have also been investigated. These methods include the use of flow
deflectors, and raising of the legs of the occupant towards the torso.
The data generated by CFD computations includes aerodynamic forces and
moments for use in analyzing the stability of the ejection seat, and surface
pressure data for use in determining the head and neck loads, and flow-field
information required to determine the readings of on-board sensors.
|
Stagnation Brim
|
Flow Deflector
|
|
Helmet Mounted Display
|
The presence of a helmet-mounted display (HMD) and night vision goggles
adds another level of complexity to the crew escape sequence. Before such
devices can be safely used , any harmful side effects they may have must
be determined.
CFDRC engineers have used CFD-FASTRAN
to analyze the effects of the attachment of various devices to helmet-head
configurations. The computations enabled the prediction of the additional
loads experienced by the occupant, prediction of the overall effect
on the aerodynamic characteristics of the seat, and prediction of
the near-field interference effects on the seat control sensors.
|
|
Canopy Separation
|
Understanding the aerodynamic characteristics and loads on a canopy
and an ejection seat during their separation and emergence from an aircraft
is necessary to determine the potential for occupant contact with the
aircraft canopy. Because of the high costs of escape system evaluation
using ground or flight-testing facilities, it has become increasingly
cost effective to use computational methods to simulate the actual event.
Using CFD-FASTRAN, CFDRC engineers have performed various canopy separation
analyses. These analyses combined the CFD flow-solution module with an
aerodynamically-coupled rigid-body motion model to yield accurate trajectory
predictions.
CFD-FASTRAN
capabilities include motion constraints that represent the slides and
hinges that control the motion of the canopy during the initial phases
of separation, and ockets that are used to force the canopy away from
the body of the aircraft. The figure and animation on the right shows
the results from an analysis for an F/A-18 rocket-jettisoned canopy. The
figure shows the close agreement between the computational results predicted
with CFD-FASTRAN and the corresponding hardware test data.
CFDRC engineers have considerable experience in developing and applying
CFD technology for analysis and support of a wide range of crew escape
systems applications. These include stabilization devices, windblast protection,
head and neck injuries, inflatable restraints, rocket plume interference
and jettisoned canopy and ejection seat trajectory predictions.
|

Click image for movie
|
Ejection/Occupant Emergence
|
As an ejection seat and its occupant exit an aircraft, the configuration
enters a highly complex and transient flow field. Understanding the emergence
effects encountered during the initial stages of the ejection sequence
requires high fidelity analysis. CFDRC engineers have developed and successfully
applied computational simulation tools to model the complex phenomena
associated with emergence and full sequence ejection events.
The figure and animation on the right show results from simulations performed
by CFDRC engineers using CFD-FASTRAN
for an SIIIS seat emerging from an AV-8B aircraft. The simulations utilized
the code's overset chimera algorithm and its rigid-body dynamics model.
The simulations also utilized the features in CFD-FASTRAN that allow the
user to specify motion constraints, and time- and distance-dependent point
forces. The data generated included aerodynamic forces and moments for
stability and control analysis, surface pressures for determining head
and neck loads, and kinematics and dynamics data for trajectory analysis.
The head loads predicted in these simulations compared well with the corresponding
sled test data.
CFDRC engineers have considerable experience in developing and applying
CFD technology for analysis and support of a wide range of crew escape
systems applications including stabilization devices, windblast protection,
head and neck injuries, inflatable restraints, rocket plume interference,
and jettisoned canopy and ejection seat trajectory predictions.
|

SIII Ejection Seat and Occupant Separating From
AV-8B Aircraft
Click image for movie
|
Controllable Propulsion
|
Rocket propulsion systems are an essential part of ejection-seat escape
systems. The thrust applied by the rockets propels the seat out of the
aircraft, and stabilizes the seat during and after the ejection sequence.
CFDRC engineers have provided analysis and support to several programs
involving controllable propulsion systems. Some of the problems considered
required analysis of the influence of the rocket plumes on the aerodynamic
behavior of the seat. CFDRC engineers support efforts by the U.S. Navy,
Aerojet and the Boeing Company to develop a controllable propulsion system
for the Fourth Generation Ejection Seat program.
|
|
For more information on our technologies and capabilities in this area
and to discuss your specific needs, please contact
us.
Return to Top |