next up previous
Next: Semiclassical and Quantum Charge Up: Quantum Transport with Band-Structure Previous: Quantum Transport with Band-Structure

Parameterized Single Band Model

For state-of-the-art In-based resonant tunneling diodes (RTDs) [1], transport takes place solely within the tex2html_wrap_inline272 valley of the conduction band. However, the non-parabolicity is so large that we are forced to use a 10-band sp3s* model [2]. Modeling transport in a single valley of a single band with a full 10-band model is inefficient. Therefore, we describe a parameterized 1-band tight-binding model that mimics the the full-band tex2html_wrap_inline272 -valley non-parabolicity. To make quantitative comparisons with experimental results, a self-consistent quantum charge calculation is also generally required. As part of that calculation, we describe our improved method for calculating the semi-classical and quantum electron charge, Fermi-level, and Jacobian that is consistent with the full bandstructure model. Finally, we describe our Schottky contact model that is compatible with any localized orbital bandstructure model.

To mimic the tex2html_wrap_inline272 -valley non-parabolicity with a single-band model, we parameterize as functions of kinetic energy and transverse momentum the hopping elements and site energies of the 1-band, tight-binding Hamiltonian according to

  equation18

where tex2html_wrap_inline280 is the kinetic energy, tex2html_wrap_inline282 is the transverse (real) wavevector, tex2html_wrap_inline284 is the longitudinal (in general complex) wavevector, t is the hopping element, and D is the correction to the site energy. The arrays tex2html_wrap_inline290 and tex2html_wrap_inline292 are created from the bulk tex2html_wrap_inline294 dispersion relation and then used for interpolation in the transport calculation.

The arrays are created from the following algorithm. For each tex2html_wrap_inline282 , the kinetic energy, tex2html_wrap_inline280 , is swept from a minimum to maximum value. At each tex2html_wrap_inline280 value, tex2html_wrap_inline284 is found from the full-band dispersion relation, tex2html_wrap_inline294 . Near the conduction band edge, tex2html_wrap_inline290 is found from tex2html_wrap_inline308 where the derivative is obtained from tex2html_wrap_inline294 . At higher energies, the dispersion becomes fairly linear and we find tex2html_wrap_inline290 from the first derivative: tex2html_wrap_inline314 . Thus, we choose t to give the correct effective mass or group velocity. With t set, we then choose D to give the correct energy, i.e. tex2html_wrap_inline322 . At each point of the actual dispersion we are choosing a tight-binding dispersion with the correct slope or curvature. We then add a site potential to move the tight-binding dispersion up or down to get the right energy.

For the transport calculations, we work with total energy, E, and transverse momentum, tex2html_wrap_inline282 [3]. Foreach E, tex2html_wrap_inline282 and site i, we calculate the kinetic energy, tex2html_wrap_inline334 , and then interpolate from tex2html_wrap_inline292 and tex2html_wrap_inline290 to obtain the Hamiltonian elements, tex2html_wrap_inline340 and tex2html_wrap_inline342 . The averaged value of t is used between sites, and the site energy at site i is given by tex2html_wrap_inline348 where tex2html_wrap_inline350 . This reproduces the standard tight-binding Hamiltonian for a cosine dispersion.


next up previous
Next: Semiclassical and Quantum Charge Up: Quantum Transport with Band-Structure Previous: Quantum Transport with Band-Structure

Roger Lake
Thu Oct 9 17:23:41 CDT 1997